“Women could
change others by changing themselves, and the phrase ‘woman’s sphere is in the
home’ could appear to mean ‘woman’s sphere is to reform the world,” (49). This
line from Nina Baym’s Woman’s Fiction speaks volumes when applied to Little
Women by Louisa May Alcott. The novel delves into the lives of the March
sisters as they navigate through the ups and downs of adolescence that help them
grow into young women in the 1800s. In Little Women, Alcott shows the
importance of the March sisters becoming better people throughout their lives
in all aspects, including becoming stronger and more independent women. What
makes Little Women so authentic is Louisa May Alcott’s personal struggles
that align with the March sisters with following the expectations of women to
be domestic and obedient with marriage as the most important goal. Mrs. March
voices that she wishes for her daughters to be “well and wisely married” because
“to be loved and chosen by a good man is the best and sweetest thing that can
happen to a woman,” (96). Jo, who is representative of Alcott herself, is
independent and tomboyish with the desire to be a writer; despite the expectations
of society and her mother, the last thing she cares to be is a wife. While we
see Meg and Amy act as proper women with the goal of marrying a nice, wealthy
man, Jo is outspoken and temperamental with a self-proclaimed “abominable tongue”
(256). These reasons are why Jo is such a fan favorite – she is real and presented
with lots of depth, which I cannot imagine to be the case for most female
literary characters in the 1800s. While she does end up married in the end to
Mr. Bhaer, Jo’s determination and spunkiness makes her stand out and can be
relatable to feminists of 2020 as well as those in the late 1800s who also did
not fit the mold of a “proper lady”.
Little Women was written during the era of “woman’s fiction” that we read and discussed in class,
which gives additional insight into why Alcott’s novel was so impactful. In 1868
when Little Women was published, it fit into the genre of “woman’s
fiction” as coined by Nina Baym, which includes books written “by and about women
in America” from 1820-1870. As Baym describes, central to these stories is “a heroine
who, beset with hardships, finds within herself the qualities of intelligence,
will, resourcefulness, and courage,” (22), who is also “without a suitor” for
much of the novel (38) – is this not very much a description of Jo? Little
Women and woman’s fiction are great sources of inspiration for women now
and then that are looking for female role models that defy societal
expectations of womanhood.
You state that “Alcott shows the importance of the March sisters becoming better people throughout their lives in all aspects, including becoming stronger and more independent women”. However I agree more with the viewpoint Mackenzie discusses in her blog post that the March sisters actually lose their independence and defiance of social norms over the course of the novel. As she points out, all of the sisters end up married by the end of the novel. They all start families and take on the expected role of homemaker. This is far from a role model for defying societal expectations in todays society.
ReplyDeleteFor its time Little Women can be considered as breaking from societal expectations of women, however it certainly would not be considered feminist from a modern perspective. Especially considering how much it emphasizes that women should control and repress their emotions.