Friday, February 7, 2020

You Can't Always Get What You Want...But You Get What You Need


Louisa May Alcott’s Little Women captures the complex environment that women dealt with in the mid-nineteenth century, from the expectations that they faced from the rest of society to the difficulty of growing up without a male presence in the household, to even having to deal with the struggles of wealth inequality. Alcott reflects these aspects of life through the March sisters and illustrates how these factors can influence life decisions and paths. Oftentimes, people envision lives for themselves that differ from what they experience, and this is shown beautifully in Little Women.

The girls all begin with preconceived notions of how they want their lives to end, most notably Meg. Among the sisters, she is by far the most aware and upset about the financial burdens that her family faces. As Alcott explains, “She was ‘fond of luxury,’ and her chief trouble was poverty… It was very natural that the young girl should long for pretty things, gay friends, accomplishments, and a happy life” (Alcott 37). For much of the beginning of the book, Meg pines for a better life, and hopes to marry a rich man so that she may be able to live in luxury, with no concern for money. However, as she matures, she learns that happiness and wealth are not directly correlated. After returning from her stay with the Moffat family, Meg realizes that she is much happier embracing her own life than pretending to be rich and snobby, and her discussion with Jo and her mother begins to open her eyes to the fact that there is more to life than money. Finally, when Mr. Brooke proposes to Meg, Aunt March heavily opposes it because he is poor. Meg responds, “I’m not afraid of being poor, for I’ve been happy so far, and I know I shall be with him, because he loves me” (Alcott 231). Alcott shows that as time goes on, people’s views and values can change, and that just because things do not always turn out as planned, does not mean that the worst has happened. By the end of Little Women, Meg and Mr. Brooke are happily married with two children, and although they are not rich, they are happy, and Meg has found fulfillment in her life. She has moved past just wanting to be rich.

The March sisters all undergo major changes from the beginning of Little Women to the end, and their values, desires and outlooks on life all mature as they grow as people. Through their changes, Alcott depicts how young people think they know what they want out of life, when in reality, their opinions and perspectives will develop over time. To be truly happy, one must embrace what they are passionate about and what is meaningful to them, not what they think society wants them to be.

1 comment:

  1. This is an interpretation of Little Women that I admit I did not have, and while it makes sense, I think pointing out the sexist implications of the girls’ “transformation” is also important. It is one thing to write a story in which young characters grow up to be something different than they envisioned, but it is quite another to write a story in which young female characters all grow up to be homemakers, mothers, and wives, when this was not what they had envisioned. Both Jo and Amy giving up their dream to make a living off of creative pursuits (writing and art) to become housewives and mothers is not the same, to me, as just their values being changed; every daughter grew up to be the exact same thing, which seems incredibly improbably if one is going to make the argument that these changes were not necessarily for the worse. It is significant that they are all the same type of woman, now, when they were so different at the beginning; this hints at an erasure of character, not a growth of it. If even one of them had not chosen to become a housewife, I’d agree completely with your analysis; as it is, I feel that it does not tell the whole story. Framing the narrative as that of three independent women growing a learning and making their own choices falters when one realizes that they all made the same choice; at that point, I think it is wise to consider author’s intent and societal context as well. The book does not exist in a vacuum.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.